You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Expert perspectives on global biodiversity loss and its drivers and impacts on people
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/fee.2536 |
| Authors |
Forest Isbell, Patricia Balvanera, Akira S Mori, Jin‐Sheng He, James M Bullock, Ganga Ram Regmi, Eric W Seabloom, Simon Ferrier, Osvaldo E Sala, Nathaly R Guerrero‐Ramírez, Julia Tavella, Daniel J Larkin, Bernhard Schmid, Charlotte L Outhwaite, Pairot Pramual, Elizabeth T Borer, Michel Loreau, Taiwo Crossby Omotoriogun, David O Obura, Maggie Anderson, Cristina Portales‐Reyes, Kevin Kirkman, Pablo M Vergara, Adam Thomas Clark, Kimberly J Komatsu, Owen L Petchey, Sarah R Weiskopf, Laura J Williams, Scott L Collins, Nico Eisenhauer, Christopher H Trisos, Delphine Renard, Alexandra J Wright, Poonam Tripathi, Jane Cowles, Jarrett EK Byrnes, Peter B Reich, Andy Purvis, Zati Sharip, Mary I O’Connor, Clare E Kazanski, Nick M Haddad, Eulogio H Soto, Laura E Dee, Sandra Díaz, Chad R Zirbel, Meghan L Avolio, Shaopeng Wang, Zhiyuan Ma, Jingjing Liang, Hanan C Farah, Justin Andrew Johnson, Brian W Miller, Yann Hautier, Melinda D Smith, Johannes MH Knops, Bonnie JE Myers, Zuzana V Harmáčková, Jorge Cortés, Michael BJ Harfoot, Andrew Gonzalez, Tim Newbold, Jacqueline Oehri, Marina Mazón, Cynnamon Dobbs, Meredith S Palmer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 186 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 27 | 15% |
| Germany | 11 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 5% |
| Spain | 8 | 4% |
| Canada | 5 | 3% |
| Kenya | 5 | 3% |
| South Africa | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| Sweden | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 16% |
| Unknown | 80 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 105 | 56% |
| Scientists | 75 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 288 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 46 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 12% |
| Unknown | 109 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 68 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 55 | 19% |
| Arts and Humanities | 7 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 8% |
| Unknown | 124 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 651. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#33,954
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#12
of 1,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,124
of 436,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.