You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Songbird abundance in native and planted grassland varies with type and amount of grassland in the surrounding landscape
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wildlife Management, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/jwmg.537 |
| Authors |
Stephen K. Davis, Ryan J. Fisher, Susan L. Skinner, Terry L. Shaffer, R. Mark Brigham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 53% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2017.
All research outputs
#14,388,554
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#1,861
of 2,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,797
of 208,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.