You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
2015年表紙更新にあたって : 前年の「表紙問題」のまとめとこれから(アーティクル)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.11517/jjsai.30.1_2 |
| Authors |
大澤 博隆 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 57% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2022.
All research outputs
#6,512,929
of 25,635,728 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence
#59
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,195
of 360,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,635,728 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.