↓ Skip to main content

Characterisation of the immune microenvironment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in immunosuppression

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Dermatology, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Characterisation of the immune microenvironment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in immunosuppression
Published in
Experimental Dermatology, July 2022
DOI 10.1111/exd.14650
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a common cancer. Systemic immunosuppression with drugs such as Prednisone results in more aggressive disease. We hypothesise that more aggressive disease in immunosuppression is the result of immune changes in the tumour microenvironment. We characterised T cell, phagocytic and antigen presenting cell subsets in cSCC, and determined if these infiltrates were altered by immunosuppressive therapy. We found a dominant 'CD8 profile' in the centre of cSCC lesions, with CD8 cells correlating with Tbet, FoxP3, OX40 and 'M2-like' macrophages, whereas a 'Tbet and granulocyte profile' with associated inflammation predominated at the margin of the tumour. Individuals on systemic immunosuppressive therapy had lesions that were comparable in size, stage and number of vessels to immune competent individuals however the number of CD11c positive cells in the lesion centre was significantly reduced. We conclude that cSCC lesions are immunologically heterogeneous across the lesion and that systemically immunosuppressed individuals have reduced CD11c positive cells in the centre of the lesion. The role and detailed phenotype of CD11c positive cells in cSCC lesions warrants further investigation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 23%
Unspecified 2 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2022.
All research outputs
#20,349,664
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Dermatology
#2,022
of 2,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#341,998
of 431,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Dermatology
#31
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,223 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.