↓ Skip to main content

「人工知能」誌の表紙デザイン意見・議論に接して : 視覚表象研究の視点から(「人工知能」表紙問題における議論と論点の整理)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
「人工知能」誌の表紙デザイン意見・議論に接して : 視覚表象研究の視点から(「人工知能」表紙問題における議論と論点の整理)
Published in
Journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, March 2014
DOI 10.11517/jjsai.29.2_167
Authors

池田 忍, 山崎 明子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2022.
All research outputs
#14,611,205
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence
#138
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,691
of 236,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them