↓ Skip to main content

山田豊著, 『ワーズワスとコールリッジ-詩的対話十年の足跡』, 音羽書房鶴見書店, 2013年6月, 21.4x15.2x3.8cm, 597頁, 本体5,200円

Overview of attention for article published in Essays in English Romanticism, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
山田豊著, 『ワーズワスとコールリッジ-詩的対話十年の足跡』, 音羽書房鶴見書店, 2013年6月, 21.4x15.2x3.8cm, 597頁, 本体5,200円
Published in
Essays in English Romanticism, January 2017
DOI 10.18986/eer.38.0_100
Authors

山田 崇人

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2022.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Essays in English Romanticism
#3
of 9 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,442
of 423,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Essays in English Romanticism
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.