↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Multiple regulatory elements result in regional specificity in circadian rhythms of neuropeptide expression in mouse SCN
Published in
NeuroReport, October 1999
DOI 10.1097/00001756-199910190-00008
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

It is well established that the mammalian circadian system consists of pacemaker cells in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN). The mouse has become increasingly important in understanding the circadian timing system, due to the availability of mutant animals with abnormal circadian rhythms. In the present paper, we describe the organization of the mouse SCN, comparing the wild type and Clock mutant animal, with a special focus on those peptides bearing an upstream E-box element (vasopressin, vasoactive intestinal peptide, cholecystokinin and substance P). To this end, we describe the distribution of the foregoing SCN peptidergic cell types as well as gastrin-related peptide, calretinin, calbindin, somatostatin, neurotensin and retinal input to the SCN (determined by both tract tracing and fos-immunoreactivity in response to a light pulse). The Clock mutant mouse has decreased expression of vasopressin mRNA and protein in the SCN, with normal patterns of expression elsewhere in the brain. No other differences were detected between the Clock mutant and the wild type mouse. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that there are multiple regulatory elements of clock-controlled genes in the SCN.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Researcher 5 14%
Professor 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 43%
Neuroscience 9 26%
Mathematics 1 3%
Linguistics 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2002.
All research outputs
#9,515,244
of 27,777,630 outputs
Outputs from NeuroReport
#746
of 3,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,913
of 40,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroReport
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,777,630 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.