You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
インフリキシマブ二次無効の機序と対策,治療方針
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of gastro-enterology, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.11405/nisshoshi.109.364 |
| Authors |
金井 隆典, 松岡 克善, 久松 理一, 岩男 泰, 緒方 晴彦, 日比 紀文 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2022.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of gastro-enterology
#111
of 308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,787
of 169,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of gastro-enterology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 308 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them