↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Breast density (BD) assessment with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): Agreement between Quantra™ and 5th edition BI-RADS®
Published in
The Breast, October 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.breast.2016.10.003
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To assess the agreement between digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) breast density (BD) assessment made using Quantra™ and fifth edition BI-RADS(®). This board approved study involved BD assessment of 234 women undergoing DBT investigation. BD estimation was performed from the raw DBT images using Quantra™ 3 (v.2.1.1, Hologic, Bedford MA). BI-RADS(®) assessment was performed using prior digital mammograms displayed simultaneously with 2D images synthesized from DBT by three radiologists using the fifth edition BI-RADS(®) (A, B, C, D). Kappa (к) was used to assess inter-reader agreement, agreement between Quantra™ and each reader, as well as the majority report of all readers. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the performance of Quantra™ in reproducing the majority BI-RADS(®) assessment. Data was then grouped into a two-category scale [almost entirely fatty and scattered fibroglandular tissue (A-B) versus heterogeneously dense and extremely dense (C-D)], and a further analysis performed. Inter-reader agreement varied from fair [0.38 (95%CI: 0.30-0.46)] to substantial [0.68 (95%CI: 0.61-0.75)] on a four-category scale and substantial [0.70 (95%CI: 0.61-0.78)] to almost perfect [0.85 (95%CI: 0.78-0.92)] on a two-category scale. Using the majority report, the agreement between BI-RADS(®) and Quantra™ was 0.68 (95%CI: 0.59-0.75) on a four-category scale and 0.86 (95%CI: 0.79-0.93) on a two-category scale. Quantra™ distinguished BI-RADS(®) A-B from C-D with 97.1% sensitivity and 83.1% specificity. Data demonstrate moderate to substantial agreement in BD assessment between fifth edition BI-RADS(®) and Quantra™.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 13%
Professor 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 17%
Computer Science 3 10%
Unspecified 1 3%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,942,896
of 27,412,402 outputs
Outputs from The Breast
#470
of 1,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,400
of 314,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Breast
#17
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,412,402 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.