↓ Skip to main content

Fibular taping does not influence ankle dorsiflexion range of motion or balance measures in individuals with chronic ankle instability

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Fibular taping does not influence ankle dorsiflexion range of motion or balance measures in individuals with chronic ankle instability
Published in
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, March 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.02.012
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To determine the effects of fibular taping on ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) and dynamic balance in individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Greece 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 149 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 21%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Researcher 9 6%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 43 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 32%
Sports and Recreations 23 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 13%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 46 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#15,170,530
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
#1,872
of 2,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,209
of 210,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
#27
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.