↓ Skip to main content

Ketamine: Use in Anesthesia

Overview of attention for article published in CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 1,797)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Ketamine: Use in Anesthesia
Published in
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics, March 2013
DOI 10.1111/cns.12072
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The role of ketamine anesthesia in the prehospital, emergency department and operating theater settings is not well defined. A nonsystematic review of ketamine was performed by authors from Australia, Europe, and North America. Results were discussed among authors and the final manuscript accepted. Ketamine is a useful agent for induction of anesthesia, procedural sedation, and analgesia. Its properties are appealing in many awkward clinical scenarios. Practitioners need to be cognizant of its side effects and limitations.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 230 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 15%
Student > Master 22 9%
Researcher 20 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Student > Postgraduate 18 8%
Other 46 20%
Unknown 73 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 42%
Neuroscience 12 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Psychology 7 3%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 73 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2026.
All research outputs
#1,047,925
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
#41
of 1,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,229
of 245,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
#2
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.