↓ Skip to main content

Premalignant lesions of the urinary bladder

Overview of attention for article published in Pathology, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Premalignant lesions of the urinary bladder
Published in
Pathology, April 2013
DOI 10.1097/pat.0b013e32835f6169
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Although most carcinomas of the bladder occur de novo, some vesical lesions progress to malignancy over time. These lesions appear morphologically benign, but often harbour genetic changes that signify their malignant potential. Despite their benign appearance, accurate identification is important given that these patients will require close follow-up. In addition to this some lesions may mimic carcinoma, and as a consequence, misdiagnosis could result in serious over-treatment. In this review, we discuss the clinical and histological features as well as the differential diagnosis of lesions of the bladder that have the potential to progress to cancer. Specifically, we present the features of flat, papillary and atypical urothelial hyperplasia, urothelial papilloma, urothelial dysplasia, intestinal metaplasia, keratinising squamous metaplasia, verrucous squamous hyperplasia and condyloma acuminatum and examine the molecular and clinical evidence relating to their malignant potential.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 15%
Other 3 11%
Librarian 2 7%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 7 26%
Unknown 7 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Decision Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 9 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2013.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Pathology
#808
of 1,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,680
of 212,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pathology
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,528 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.