↓ Skip to main content

斑晶の岩石学的解析(1)─観察と分析の基礎─

Overview of attention for article published in BULLETIN OF THE VOLCANOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
斑晶の岩石学的解析(1)─観察と分析の基礎─
Published in
BULLETIN OF THE VOLCANOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, June 2022
DOI 10.18940/kazan.67.2_233
Authors

鈴木 由希

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2022.
All research outputs
#15,532,577
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from BULLETIN OF THE VOLCANOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
#125
of 205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,044
of 446,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BULLETIN OF THE VOLCANOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 205 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.