↓ Skip to main content

Flonicamid metabolite 4‐trifluoromethylnicotinamide is a chordotonal organ modulator insecticide†

Overview of attention for article published in Pest Management Science, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Flonicamid metabolite 4‐trifluoromethylnicotinamide is a chordotonal organ modulator insecticide†
Published in
Pest Management Science, August 2022
DOI 10.1002/ps.7101
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The selective aphicide flonicamid is known to cause symptoms in aphids that are like those of chordotonal organ TRPV channel modulator insecticides such as pymetrozine, pyrifluquinazon and afidopyropen. Flonicamid is classified by IRAC as a chordotonal organ modulator with an undefined target site. However, while it has been shown not to act on TRPV channels, flonicamid's action on chordotonal organs has not been documented in the literature. Flonicamid causes locusts to extend their hindlegs, indicating an action on the femoral chordotonal organ. In fruit flies it abolishes negative gravitaxis behavior by disrupting transduction and mechanical amplification in antennal chordotonal neurons. While flonicamid itself only weakly affects locust chordotonal organs, its major animal metabolite 4-trifluoromethylnicotinamide (TFNA-AM) potently stimulates both locust and fly chordotonal organs. Like pymetrozine, TFNA-AM rapidly increases Ca2+ in antennal chordotonal neurons in wild-type flies, but not iav1 mutants, yet the effect is non-additive with the TRPV channel agonist. Flonicamid is a pro-insecticide form of TFNA-AM, a potent chordotonal organ modulator. The functional effects of TFNA-AM on chordotonal organs of locusts and flies are indistinguishable from those of the TRPV agonists pymetrozine, pyrifluquinazon and afidopyropen. Since our previous results indicate that TFNA-AM does not act directly on TRPV channels,1 we conclude that it acts upstream in a pathway that leads to TRPV channel activation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Unknown 13 65%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Unknown 13 65%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2023.
All research outputs
#11,806,431
of 33,510,145 outputs
Outputs from Pest Management Science
#1,368
of 3,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,465
of 448,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pest Management Science
#17
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,510,145 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.