↓ Skip to main content

関めぐみ著『〈女子マネ〉のエスノグラフィー――大学運動部における男同士の絆と性差別』

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Sociological Review / Shakaigaku Hyoron, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
関めぐみ著『〈女子マネ〉のエスノグラフィー――大学運動部における男同士の絆と性差別』
Published in
Japanese Sociological Review / Shakaigaku Hyoron, July 2020
DOI 10.4057/jsr.70.62
Authors

小笠原 祐子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2022.
All research outputs
#21,049,824
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Sociological Review / Shakaigaku Hyoron
#473
of 680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#329,384
of 428,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Sociological Review / Shakaigaku Hyoron
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 680 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them