↓ Skip to main content

Mechanical changes in the Achilles tendon due to insertional Achilles tendinopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mechanical changes in the Achilles tendon due to insertional Achilles tendinopathy
Published in
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, August 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.022
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) is a painful and debilitating condition that responds poorly to non-surgical interventions. It is thought that this disease may originate from compression of the Achilles tendon due to calcaneal impingement. Thus, compressive mechanical changes associated with IAT may elucidate its etiology and offer clues to guide effective treatment. However, the mechanical properties of IAT tissue have not been characterized. Therefore, the objective of this study was to measure the mechanical properties of excised IAT tissue and compare with healthy cadaveric control tissue. Tissue from the Achilles tendon insertion was acquired from healthy donors and from patients undergoing debridement surgery for IAT. Several tissue specimens from each donor were then mechanically tested under cyclic unconfined compression and the acquired data was analyzed to determine the distribution of mechanical properties for each donor. While the median mechanical properties of tissue excised from IAT tendons were not significantly different than healthy tissue, the distribution of mechanical properties within each donor was dramatically altered. In particular, healthy tendons contained more low modulus (compliant) and high transition strain specimens than IAT tendons, as evidenced by a significantly lower 25th percentile secant modulus and higher 75th percentile transition strain. Furthermore, these parameters were significantly correlated with symptom severity. Finally, it was found that preconditioning and slow loading both reduced the secant modulus of healthy and IAT specimens, suggesting that slow, controlled ankle dorsiflexion prior to activity may help IAT patients manage disease-associated pain.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 109 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 19%
Student > Master 20 18%
Other 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 25 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 17%
Sports and Recreations 10 9%
Engineering 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 30 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2017.
All research outputs
#15,740,505
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
#678
of 1,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,753
of 277,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
#12
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,333 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.