↓ Skip to main content

Wound research funding from alternative sources of federal funds in 2012

Overview of attention for article published in Wound Repair & Regeneration, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Wound research funding from alternative sources of federal funds in 2012
Published in
Wound Repair & Regeneration, May 2014
DOI 10.1111/wrr.12175
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 15 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Engineering 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 16 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2025.
All research outputs
#12,452,549
of 34,601,305 outputs
Outputs from Wound Repair & Regeneration
#657
of 1,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,894
of 273,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wound Repair & Regeneration
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,601,305 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.