↓ Skip to main content

Follow-up after gestational diabetes: a qualitative study of perspectives from general practices

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Follow-up after gestational diabetes: a qualitative study of perspectives from general practices
Published in
BJGP Open, April 2022
DOI 10.3399/bjgpo.2021.0241
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Hyldgaard Nielsen, Kirsten Fonager, Jette Kolding Kristensen, Charlotte Overgaard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 13 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 6 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 15 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2022.
All research outputs
#16,431,747
of 24,203,404 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#491
of 565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,619
of 430,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#26
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,203,404 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.