↓ Skip to main content

Surgical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in children: A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatric Surgery (Science Direct), October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Surgical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in children: A systematic review
Published in
Journal of Pediatric Surgery (Science Direct), October 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.09.072
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The goal of this systematic review by the American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence-Based Practice Committee was to derive recommendations from the medical literature regarding the surgical treatment of pediatric gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Five questions were addressed by searching the MEDLINE, Cochrane, Embase, Central, and National Guideline Clearinghouse databases using relevant search terms. Consensus recommendations were derived for each question based on the best available evidence. There was insufficient evidence to formulate recommendations for all questions. Fundoplication does not affect the rate of hospitalization for aspiration pneumonia, apnea, or reflux-related symptoms. Fundoplication is effective in reducing all parameters of esophageal acid exposure without altering esophageal motility. Laparoscopic fundoplication may be comparable to open fundoplication with regard to short-term clinical outcomes. Partial fundoplication and complete fundoplication are comparable in effectiveness for subjective control of GERD. Fundoplication may benefit GERD patients with asthma, but may not improve outcomes in patients with neurologic impairment or esophageal atresia. Overall GERD recurrence rates are likely below 20%. High-quality evidence is lacking regarding the surgical management of GERD in the pediatric population. Definitive conclusions regarding the effectiveness of fundoplication are limited by patient heterogeneity and lack of a standardized outcomes reporting framework. Systematic review of level 1-4 studies. Level 1-4 (mainly level 3-4).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 127 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 15 12%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 30 23%
Unknown 43 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 54 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,160,184
of 34,559,526 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatric Surgery (Science Direct)
#487
of 6,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,463
of 337,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatric Surgery (Science Direct)
#8
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,559,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,718 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.