↓ Skip to main content

病院に勤務する看護師のワーク・エンゲイジメントと組織公平性との関連

Overview of attention for article published in [Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
病院に勤務する看護師のワーク・エンゲイジメントと組織公平性との関連
Published in
[Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health, May 2022
DOI 10.11236/jph.21-084
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akiko Matsuoka, Mika Tanaka

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to clarify the relationship between organizational justice and work engagement among nurses.Methods Japanese nurses working in a medium-sized hospital in the Tokyo metropolitan area were surveyed using a self-administered questionnaire. We conducted a stepwise multiple regression analysis with scores from the Japanese version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-J) as the dependent variable and scores from the Japanese version of the Organizational Justice Scale (OJS-J), age, sex, position, employment status, shift work, self-efficacy, social support, work control, and work quantitative load as the independent variables. Additionally, a stepwise multiple regression analysis was conducted for each OJS-J subscale score.Results The questionnaire was distributed to 270 nurses, of whom 219 (83.0% response rate) provided valid responses. With the UWES-J as the dependent variable, Model 1 adjusted only for age and sex; Model 2 adjusted for position, employment status, shift work, and self-efficacy score; and Model 3 adjusted for the social support, work control, and work quantitative load scores. Model 2 and Model 3 showed a significant association to the positive direction between UWES-J and OJS-J (Model 3: β=0.202, P<0.01, R2=0.363). Furthermore, when the same analysis was conducted for each OJS-J subscale score, a significant association was found between procedural justice scores and the UWES-J (Model 3: β=0.165, P<0.05, R2=0.383). Neither model found a significant difference between distributional equity scores and information equity scores.Conclusion The results of this study examining the relationship between work engagement and organizational justice among hospital nurses showed that work engagement was associated with organizational justice, especially procedural justice. These results suggest that maintaining and improving organizational justice is important for improving nurses' work engagement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2022.
All research outputs
#21,049,824
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from [Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health
#228
of 457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#336,550
of 448,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from [Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.