↓ Skip to main content

Y-Chromosomal Diversity in Europe Is Clinal and Influenced Primarily by Geography, Rather than by Language

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Human Genetics, November 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
44 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
461 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Y-Chromosomal Diversity in Europe Is Clinal and Influenced Primarily by Geography, Rather than by Language
Published in
American Journal of Human Genetics, November 2000
DOI 10.1086/316890
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zoë H. Rosser, Tatiana Zerjal, Matthew E. Hurles, Maarja Adojaan, Dragan Alavantic, António Amorim, William Amos, Manuel Armenteros, Eduardo Arroyo, Guido Barbujani, Gunhild Beckman, Lars Beckman, Jaume Bertranpetit, Elena Bosch, Daniel G. Bradley, Gaute Brede, Gillian Cooper, Helena B.S.M. Côrte-Real, Peter de Knijff, Ronny Decorte, Yuri E. Dubrova, Oleg Evgrafov, Anja Gilissen, Sanja Glisic, Mukaddes Gölge, Emmeline W. Hill, Anna Jeziorowska, Luba Kalaydjieva, Manfred Kayser, Toomas Kivisild, Sergey A. Kravchenko, Astrida Krumina, Vaidutis Kučinskas, João Lavinha, Ludmila A. Livshits, Patrizia Malaspina, Syrrou Maria, Ken McElreavey, Thomas A. Meitinger, Aavo-Valdur Mikelsaar, R. John Mitchell, Khedoudja Nafa, Jayne Nicholson, Søren Nørby, Arpita Pandya, Jüri Parik, Philippos C. Patsalis, Luísa Pereira, Borut Peterlin, Gerli Pielberg, Maria João Prata, Carlo Previderé, Lutz Roewer, Siiri Rootsi, D.C. Rubinsztein, Juliette Saillard, Fabrício R. Santos, Gheorghe Stefanescu, Bryan C. Sykes, Aslihan Tolun, Richard Villems, Chris Tyler-Smith, Mark A. Jobling

Abstract

Clinal patterns of autosomal genetic diversity within Europe have been interpreted in previous studies in terms of a Neolithic demic diffusion model for the spread of agriculture; in contrast, studies using mtDNA have traced many founding lineages to the Paleolithic and have not shown strongly clinal variation. We have used 11 human Y-chromosomal biallelic polymorphisms, defining 10 haplogroups, to analyze a sample of 3,616 Y chromosomes belonging to 47 European and circum-European populations. Patterns of geographic differentiation are highly nonrandom, and, when they are assessed using spatial autocorrelation analysis, they show significant clines for five of six haplogroups analyzed. Clines for two haplogroups, representing 45% of the chromosomes, are continentwide and consistent with the demic diffusion hypothesis. Clines for three other haplogroups each have different foci and are more regionally restricted and are likely to reflect distinct population movements, including one from north of the Black Sea. Principal-components analysis suggests that populations are related primarily on the basis of geography, rather than on the basis of linguistic affinity. This is confirmed in Mantel tests, which show a strong and highly significant partial correlation between genetics and geography but a low, nonsignificant partial correlation between genetics and language. Genetic-barrier analysis also indicates the primacy of geography in the shaping of patterns of variation. These patterns retain a strong signal of expansion from the Near East but also suggest that the demographic history of Europe has been complex and influenced by other major population movements, as well as by linguistic and geographic heterogeneities and the effects of drift.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 2%
Germany 3 1%
France 3 1%
Australia 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 268 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 70 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 22%
Professor 29 10%
Student > Bachelor 28 9%
Student > Master 25 8%
Other 57 19%
Unknown 22 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 124 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 15%
Arts and Humanities 29 10%
Social Sciences 20 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 5%
Other 36 12%
Unknown 28 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,800,330
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#1,846
of 5,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,730
of 41,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#5
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.