↓ Skip to main content

Experience of a systematic approach to care and prevention of fragility fractures in New Zealand

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Osteoporosis, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 728)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Experience of a systematic approach to care and prevention of fragility fractures in New Zealand
Published in
Archives of Osteoporosis, August 2022
DOI 10.1007/s11657-022-01138-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Ellen Gill, Paul James Mitchell, Jan Clark, Jillian Cornish, Peter Fergusson, Nigel Gilchrist, Lynne Hayman, Sue Hornblow, David Kim, Denise Mackenzie, Stella Milsom, Adrienne von Tunzelmann, Elizabeth Binns, Kim Fergusson, Stewart Fleming, Sarah Hurring, Rebbecca Lilley, Caroline Miller, Pierre Navarre, Andrea Pettett, Shankar Sankaran, Min Yee Seow, Jenny Sincock, Nicola Ward, Mark Wright, Jacqueline Clare Therese Close, Ian Andrew Harris, Elizabeth Armstrong, Jamie Hallen, Joanna Hikaka, Ngaire Kerse, Andrea Vujnovich, Kirtan Ganda, Markus Joachim Seibel, Thomas Jackson, Paul Kennedy, Kirsten Malpas, Leona Dann, Carl Shuker, Colleen Dunne, Philip Wood, Jay Magaziner, David Marsh, Irewin Tabu, Cyrus Cooper, Philippe Halbout, Muhammad Kassim Javaid, Kristina Åkesson, Anastasia Soulié Mlotek, Eric Brûlé-Champagne, Roger Harris

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Master 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 29 59%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 33 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,220,168
of 26,801,235 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Osteoporosis
#47
of 728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,165
of 440,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Osteoporosis
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,801,235 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.