↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Sleep in Memory Consolidation and Brain Plasticity: Dream or Reality?

Overview of attention for article published in The Neuroscientist, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
279 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Role of Sleep in Memory Consolidation and Brain Plasticity: Dream or Reality?
Published in
The Neuroscientist, December 2006
DOI 10.1177/1073858406293552
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The notion that a good night of sleep improves memory is widely accepted by the general public. Among sleep scientists, however, the idea has been hotly debated for decades. In this review, the authors consider current evidence for and against the hypothesis that sleep facilitates memory consolidation and promotes plastic changes in the brain. They find that despite a steady accumulation of positive findings over the past decade, the precise role of sleep in memory and brain plasticity remains elusive. This impasse may be resolved by more integrated approaches that combine behavioral and neurophysiological measurements in well-described in vivo models of synaptic plasticity.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Germany 5 2%
France 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 255 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 20%
Researcher 45 16%
Student > Bachelor 36 13%
Student > Master 31 11%
Professor 14 5%
Other 43 15%
Unknown 53 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 20%
Psychology 57 20%
Neuroscience 38 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 6%
Sports and Recreations 16 6%
Other 35 13%
Unknown 58 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,794,129
of 26,617,918 outputs
Outputs from The Neuroscientist
#373
of 760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,709
of 173,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Neuroscientist
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,617,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them