You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
田中調節池における洪水が魚類の分布に与える効果と平水時の水田における魚類繁殖の現状
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecology and Civil Engineering, July 2022
|
DOI | 10.3825/ece.21-00033 |
Authors |
田和 康太, 細浦 大志, 露木 颯, 長谷川 雅美, 佐久間 元成, 遠藤 立, 安東 正行, 松本 充弘, 黒沼 尚史, 中村 圭吾, 佐川 志朗 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2022.
All research outputs
#14,292,486
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Ecology and Civil Engineering
#36
of 78 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,090
of 435,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology and Civil Engineering
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.