↓ Skip to main content

Transposition-Driven Genomic Heterogeneity in the Drosophila Brain

Overview of attention for article published in Science, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
24 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
477 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Transposition-Driven Genomic Heterogeneity in the Drosophila Brain
Published in
Science, April 2013
DOI 10.1126/science.1231965
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Recent studies in mammals have documented the neural expression and mobility of retrotransposons and have suggested that neural genomes are diverse mosaics. We found that transposition occurs among memory-relevant neurons in the Drosophila brain. Cell type-specific gene expression profiling revealed that transposon expression is more abundant in mushroom body (MB) αβ neurons than in neighboring MB neurons. The Piwi-interacting RNA (piRNA) proteins Aubergine and Argonaute 3, known to suppress transposons in the fly germline, are expressed in the brain and appear less abundant in αβ MB neurons. Loss of piRNA proteins correlates with elevated transposon expression in the brain. Paired-end deep sequencing identified more than 200 de novo transposon insertions in αβ neurons, including insertions into memory-relevant loci. Our observations indicate that genomic heterogeneity is a conserved feature of the brain.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 477 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
United Kingdom 5 1%
Germany 4 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
China 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 438 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 125 26%
Researcher 108 23%
Student > Master 50 10%
Student > Bachelor 30 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 27 6%
Other 79 17%
Unknown 58 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 222 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 95 20%
Neuroscience 62 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 2%
Computer Science 7 1%
Other 23 5%
Unknown 60 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,086,485
of 34,242,763 outputs
Outputs from Science
#19,620
of 93,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,670
of 248,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#164
of 878 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,242,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 878 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.