↓ Skip to main content

Pure Puffer Fish Poisoning with Prolonged Ataxia

Overview of attention for article published in NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI, January 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pure Puffer Fish Poisoning with Prolonged Ataxia
Published in
NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI, January 1996
DOI 10.3893/jjaam.7.87
Authors

Fumio Morimoto, Takeshi Shimazu, Atsushi Iwai, Atsushi Hiraide, Toshiharu Yoshioka, Tsuyoshi Sugimoto

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2022.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI
#63
of 283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,327
of 81,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them