↓ Skip to main content

&bgr;-Hydroxy &bgr;-Methylbutyrate (HMB) Supplementation Effects on Body Mass and Performance in Elite Male Rugby Union Players

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
&bgr;-Hydroxy &bgr;-Methylbutyrate (HMB) Supplementation Effects on Body Mass and Performance in Elite Male Rugby Union Players
Published in
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, January 2018
DOI 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001695
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Pre-season is characterized by high training volumes with short recovery periods β-hydroxy β-methylbutyrate (HMB) has been postulated to assist with recovery. HMB has been shown to improve strength and body composition amongst untrained groups the benefits of HMB amongst trained populations are unclear due to the methodologies employed. This randomized control trail determined the effects of 11 weeks HMB supplementation on body mass and performance measures in 27 elite rugby players. HMB group (n=13) mean±SD age 20.3±1.2 years, body mass 99.6±9.1 kg; placebo group (n=14), age 21.9±2.8 years body mass 99.4±13.9 kg for placebo. During the supplementation period body mass increased with HMB 0.57±2.60 kg but decreased with placebo 1.39±2.02 kg (p=0.029). There were no significant differences in any of the four strength variables (p>0.05). However, on the YoYo IR-1 the placebo group improved 4.0±2.8 levels but HMB decreased 2.0±3.0 levels (p=0.003). The results of this study suggest HMB could be beneficial for gaining or maintaining body mass during periods of increased training load. However, it appears that HMB may be detrimental to intermittent running ability in this group, although further research is required before firm conclusions can be made. Only 6 participants on HMB managed to complete both YoYo IR-1 tests due to injury, a larger sample size is required to fully investigate this potentially negative effect. Further, the mechanisms behind this decrement in performance cannot be fully explained and requires further biochemical and psychological investigation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 156 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Researcher 7 4%
Other 5 3%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 67 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 34 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 72 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,347,553
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
#2,157
of 7,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,697
of 496,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
#24
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 496,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.