↓ Skip to main content

Differences in the isomer composition of perfluoroctanesulfonyl (PFOS) derivatives

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Environmental Science & Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Differences in the isomer composition of perfluoroctanesulfonyl (PFOS) derivatives
Published in
Journal of Environmental Science & Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering, January 2007
DOI 10.1080/10934520601134031
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 14 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 16 31%
Engineering 6 12%
Chemistry 5 10%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 17 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2019.
All research outputs
#12,345,171
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Environmental Science & Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering
#211
of 881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,968
of 231,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Environmental Science & Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 881 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.