↓ Skip to main content

Phase behaviour of hard spheres confined between parallel hard plates: manipulation of colloidal crystal structures by confinement

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Phase behaviour of hard spheres confined between parallel hard plates: manipulation of colloidal crystal structures by confinement
Published in
Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, June 2006
DOI 10.1088/0953-8984/18/28/l02
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We study the phase behaviour of hard spheres confined between two parallel hard plates using extensive computer simulations. We determine the full equilibrium phase diagram for arbitrary densities and plate separations from one to five hard-sphere diameters using free energy calculations. We find a first-order fluid-solid transition, which corresponds to either capillary freezing or melting depending on the plate separation. The coexisting solid phase consists of crystalline layers with either triangular ([Formula: see text]) or square ([Formula: see text]) symmetry. Increasing the plate separation, we find a sequence of crystal structures from [Formula: see text], where n is the number of crystal layers, in agreement with experiments on colloids. At high densities, the transition between square to triangular phases is interrupted by intermediate structures, e.g., prism, buckled, and rhombic phases.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Norway 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 109 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 32%
Researcher 19 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Student > Master 9 8%
Professor 8 7%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 44 38%
Materials Science 17 15%
Chemistry 12 10%
Engineering 11 9%
Chemical Engineering 4 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 21 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2009.
All research outputs
#24,660,495
of 27,398,757 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
#4,220
of 6,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,619
of 95,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
#17
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,398,757 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,370 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.