↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Antigen-based heteropolymers facilitate, via primate erythrocyte complement receptor type 1, rapid erythrocyte binding of an autoantibody and its clearance from the circulation in rhesus monkeys.
Published in
The Journal of Immunology, July 1995
DOI 10.4049/jimmunol.155.1.339
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We investigated the feasibility of using the primate E complement receptor (CR1), in concert with Ag-based heteropolymers (AHP), as a potential therapy to remove autoantibodies from the circulation. AHP are prepared by cross-linking an anti-CR1 mAb with the acetylcholine receptor (AChR), the principal target Ag in myasthenia gravis. In vitro studies demonstrate that this methodology facilitates specific, rapid, and quantitative binding of an anti-AChR mAb to primate Es. In vivo experiments in rhesus monkeys indicate that AHP-mediated binding of an anti-AChR mAb to Es leads to the clearance of the mAb from the circulation. Once bound to the E via the AHP, the autoantibody is transported to the liver and spleen, where it is degraded without destruction of the E. It is therefore likely that the complexes of AHP and target mAb, when bound to Es, are recognized in vivo and processed by a mechanism quite similar to that which occurs when complement-opsonized immune complexes, bound to primate Es, are cleared from the circulation. It may be possible to extend and generalize this work to allow for the development of a simple, noninvasive therapy that can be made specific for the treatment of several different autoimmune diseases.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2006.
All research outputs
#7,582,553
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Immunology
#10,433
of 35,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,161
of 34,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Immunology
#61
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.