↓ Skip to main content

Hyperprogressive Disease Is a New Pattern of Progression in Cancer Patients Treated by Anti-PD-1/PD-L1

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
21 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
156 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1023 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
567 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hyperprogressive Disease Is a New Pattern of Progression in Cancer Patients Treated by Anti-PD-1/PD-L1
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, April 2017
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-1741
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stéphane Champiat, Laurent Dercle, Samy Ammari, Christophe Massard, Antoine Hollebecque, Sophie Postel-Vinay, Nathalie Chaput, Alexander Eggermont, Aurélien Marabelle, Jean-Charles Soria, Charles Ferté

Abstract

Purpose While Immune checkpoint inhibitors are disrupting the management of cancer patients, anecdotal occurrences of rapid progression (i.e. hyperprogressive disease or HPD) under these agents have been described, suggesting potentially deleterious effects of these drugs. The prevalence, the natural history and the predictive factors of HPD in cancer patients treated by anti PD-1/PD-L1 remain unknown. Experimental design Medical records from all patients (N =218) prospectively treated in Gustave Roussy by anti PD-1/PD-L1 within phase I clinical trials were analyzed. The tumor growth rate (TGR) prior ("REFERENCE") and upon ("EXPERIMENTAL") anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy was compared to identify patients with accelerated tumor growth. Associations between TGR, clinico-pathological characteristics and overall survival (OS) were computed. Results HPD was defined as a RECIST progression at the first evaluation and as a ≥ two-fold increase of the TGR between the REF and the EXP periods. Out of 131 evaluable patients, 12 patients (9%) were considered as HPD. HPD was not associated with higher tumor burden at baseline, nor with any specific tumor type. At progression, HPD patients had a lower rate of new lesions than progressive non-HPD patients (p<0.05). HPD is associated with a higher age (p<0.05) and a worse outcome (Overall Survival). Interestingly, REFERENCE TGR (before treatment) was inversely correlated with response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 (P<0.05). Conclusion A novel aggressive pattern of hyper-progression exists in a fraction of patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1. This observation raises potentially some concerns about treating elderly patients (>65 y.o) with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 156 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 567 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 564 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 130 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 12%
Other 60 11%
Student > Master 47 8%
Student > Bachelor 35 6%
Other 100 18%
Unknown 128 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 211 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 73 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 27 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 3%
Other 45 8%
Unknown 154 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 261. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#142,510
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#61
of 13,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,120
of 325,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#2
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.