↓ Skip to main content

Influence of Fe2+-catalysed iron oxide recrystallization on metal cycling

Overview of attention for article published in Biochemical Society Transactions, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Influence of Fe2+-catalysed iron oxide recrystallization on metal cycling
Published in
Biochemical Society Transactions, November 2012
DOI 10.1042/bst20120161
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Recent work has indicated that iron (oxyhydr-)oxides are capable of structurally incorporating and releasing metals and nutrients as a result of Fe2+-induced iron oxide recrystallization. In the present paper, we briefly review the current literature examining the mechanisms by which iron oxides recrystallize and summarize how recrystallization affects metal incorporation and release. We also provide new experimental evidence for the Fe2+-induced release of structural manganese from manganese-doped goethite. Currently, the exact mechanism(s) for Fe2+-induced recrystallization remain elusive, although they are likely to be both oxide-and metal-dependent. We conclude by discussing some future research directions for Fe2+-catalysed iron oxide recrystallization.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 74 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 43%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Professor 5 7%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 21 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 11%
Chemistry 6 8%
Engineering 5 7%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 20 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2012.
All research outputs
#20,187,333
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Biochemical Society Transactions
#3,101
of 3,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,704
of 275,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemical Society Transactions
#18
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,326 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.