↓ Skip to main content

Determinants, Associations, and Psychometric Properties of Resident Assessments of Anesthesiologist Operating Room Supervision

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesia and analgesia, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Determinants, Associations, and Psychometric Properties of Resident Assessments of Anesthesiologist Operating Room Supervision
Published in
Anesthesia and analgesia, April 2013
DOI 10.1213/ane.0b013e31828d7218
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A study by de Oliveira Filho et al. reported a validated set of 9 questions by which Brazilian anesthesia residents assessed faculty supervision in the operating room. The aim of this study was to use this question set to determine whether faculty operating room supervision scores were associated with residents' year of clinical anesthesia training and/or number of specific resident-faculty interactions. We also characterized associations between faculty operating room supervision scores and resident assessments of: (1) faculty supervision in settings other than operating rooms, (2) faculty clinical ability (family choice), and (3) faculty teaching effectiveness. Finally, we characterized the psychometric properties of the de Oliveira Filho etal. question set in an United States anesthesia residency program.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 9 29%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 45%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2013.
All research outputs
#24,754,523
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesia and analgesia
#8,829
of 10,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,331
of 248,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesia and analgesia
#50
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.