↓ Skip to main content

“Research Chemicals”: Tryptamine and Phenethylamine Use Among High-Risk Youth

Overview of attention for article published in Substance Use & Misuse, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
7 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
“Research Chemicals”: Tryptamine and Phenethylamine Use Among High-Risk Youth
Published in
Substance Use & Misuse, July 2009
DOI 10.1080/00952990701202970
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Tryptamines and phenethylamines are two broad categories of psychoactive substances with a long history of licit and illicit use. Profiles of users of recently emerging tryptamines and phenethylamines are nonexistent, however, since surveillance studies do not query the use of these substances. This manuscript describes the types, modes of administration, onset of use, and context of use of a variety of lesser known tryptamines and phenethylamines among a sample of high-risk youth. Findings are based upon in-depth interviews with 42 youth recruited in public settings in Los Angles during 2005 and 2006 as part of larger study examining health risks associated with injecting ketamine. Youth reported that their use of tryptamines and phenethylamines was infrequent, spontaneous, and predominately occurred at music venues, such as festivals, concerts, or raves. Several purchased a variety of these "research chemicals" from the Internet and used them in private locations. While many described positive experiences, reports of short-term negative health outcomes included nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, disorientations, and frightening hallucinations. These findings, based upon pilot study data, move toward an epidemiology of tryptamine and phenethylamine use among high-risk youth.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 85 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 24 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 14%
Psychology 10 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 7%
Other 20 23%
Unknown 26 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2024.
All research outputs
#21,589,806
of 32,923,773 outputs
Outputs from Substance Use & Misuse
#1,599
of 2,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,110
of 163,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Substance Use & Misuse
#404
of 454 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,923,773 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 454 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.