↓ Skip to main content

Genomic Variants Disrupt miRNA‐mRNA Regulation

Overview of attention for article published in Chemistry & Biodiversity, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Genomic Variants Disrupt miRNA‐mRNA Regulation
Published in
Chemistry & Biodiversity, September 2022
DOI 10.1002/cbdv.202200623
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellie Xi, Judy Bai, Klaira Zhang, Hui Yu, Yan Guo

Abstract

Micro RNA (miRNA) and its regulatory effect on messenger RNA (mRNA) gene expression are a major focus in cancer research. Disruption in the normal miRNA-mRNA regulation network can result in serious cascading biological repercussions. In this study, we curated miRNA-related variants from major genomic consortiums and thoroughly evaluated how these variants could exert their effects by cross-validating with independent functional knowledge bases. Nearly all known variants (more than 664 million) categorized by type (germline, somatic, epigenetic) were mapped to the genomic regions involved in miRNA-mRNA binding (miRNA seeds and miRNA-mRNA 3'-UTR binding sequence). Subsets of miRNA-related variants supported by additional functional evidence, such as expression Quantitative Trait Loci (eQTL) and Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS), were identified and scrutinized. Our results show that variants in miRNA seeds can substantially alter the composition of an miRNA's target mRNA set. Various functional analyses converged to reveal a post-transcriptional complex regulatory network where miRNA, eQTL, and RNA-binding protein intertwined to disseminate the impact of genomic variants. These results may potentially explain how certain variants affect disease/trait risks in genome wide association studies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Sports and Recreations 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2022.
All research outputs
#13,148,389
of 23,530,272 outputs
Outputs from Chemistry & Biodiversity
#507
of 2,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,486
of 438,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemistry & Biodiversity
#12
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,530,272 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,339 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.