↓ Skip to main content

Recent declines in genetic diversity with limited dispersal among coastal cactus wren populations in San Diego County, California

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Science and Practice, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recent declines in genetic diversity with limited dispersal among coastal cactus wren populations in San Diego County, California
Published in
Conservation Science and Practice, August 2022
DOI 10.1111/csp2.12780
Authors

Amy G. Vandergast, Barbara E. Kus, Julia G. Smith, Anna Mitelberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Other 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 30%
Unspecified 2 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 20%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,623,994
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Science and Practice
#524
of 1,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,896
of 432,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Science and Practice
#20
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.