↓ Skip to main content

Molecular-level dengue fever diagnostic devices made out of paper

Overview of attention for article published in Lab on a Chip - Miniaturisation for Chemistry & Biology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Molecular-level dengue fever diagnostic devices made out of paper
Published in
Lab on a Chip - Miniaturisation for Chemistry & Biology, January 2013
DOI 10.1039/c3lc50135c
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This paper describes the development of nucleic acid detection in paper using a combination of commercial fluorescent probes and DNA ladders, and provides us with a better understanding of the interactions between double-stranded DNA (the amplified products in this study), fiber structures in paper, and fluorescent probes. The amplified products (the reverse-transcription and amplification of dengue virus serotype-2 RNA via RT-LAMP) in this study were subsequently fluorescently labeled in paper-based test zones (on our paper-based diagnostic device), thus fluorescent probes were used to perform the diagnosis of dengue fever, specific to serotype-2.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 108 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 28%
Researcher 25 22%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 5 4%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 15 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 29 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 12%
Chemistry 11 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 18 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2013.
All research outputs
#24,122,808
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Lab on a Chip - Miniaturisation for Chemistry & Biology
#5,604
of 7,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,525
of 346,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lab on a Chip - Miniaturisation for Chemistry & Biology
#291
of 338 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 338 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.