↓ Skip to main content

Differences in Nutrient Intakes of Middle-aged and Elderly Men and Women Living in Local Communities Calculated Using the Seventh and Eighth Revised Standard Tables of Food Composition in Japan

Overview of attention for article published in Nippon Eiyo Shokuryo Gakkaishi, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences in Nutrient Intakes of Middle-aged and Elderly Men and Women Living in Local Communities Calculated Using the Seventh and Eighth Revised Standard Tables of Food Composition in Japan
Published in
Nippon Eiyo Shokuryo Gakkaishi, January 2022
DOI 10.4327/jsnfs.75.161
Authors

Tomoko Imai, Yuki Kato, Hiroshi Shimokata, Rei Otsuka

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2022.
All research outputs
#20,673,680
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Eiyo Shokuryo Gakkaishi
#272
of 348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#388,012
of 515,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Eiyo Shokuryo Gakkaishi
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 348 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.