Sapap3 and pathological grooming in humans: Results from the OCD collaborative genetics study

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric Genetics: The Official Publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics, June 2009

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news: 1 news outlet
patent: 1 patent

reddit: 2 Redditors
q&a: 1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley: 167 Mendeley

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	Sapap3 and pathological grooming in humans: Results from the OCD collaborative genetics study
Published in	American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric Genetics: The Official Publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics, June 2009
DOI	10.1002/ajmg.b.30897
Pubmed ID	19051237
Authors	O.J. Bienvenu, Y. Wang, Y.Y. Shugart, J.M. Welch, M.A. Grados, A.J. Fyer, S.L. Rauch, J.T. McCracken, S.A. Rasmussen, D.L. Murphy, B. Cullen, D. Valle, R. Hoehn‐Saric, B.D. Greenberg, A. Pinto, J.A. Knowles, J. Piacentini, D.L. Pauls, K.Y. Liang, V.L. Willour, M. Riddle, J.F. Samuels, G. Feng, G. Nestadt

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Activity

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
Singapore	1	<1%
France	1	<1%
Canada	1	<1%
Unknown	164	98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Researcher	32	19%
Student > Master	22	13%
Student > Ph. D. Student	21	13%
Student > Bachelor	15	9%
Professor > Associate Professor	9	5%
Other	25	15%
Unknown	43	26%

Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences	31	19%
Medicine and Dentistry	27	16%
Psychology	20	12%
Neuroscience	20	12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology	8	5%
Other	7	4%
Unknown	54	32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2022.

All research outputs

#3,527,867

of 34,518,147 outputs

Outputs from American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric Genetics: The Official Publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics

#102

of 1,309 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#14,115

of 178,062 outputs

Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric Genetics: The Official Publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics

of 9 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 1,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them