You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ナッジと健康増進の睦まじくも危険な関係
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of the Japanese Association for Philosophical and Ethical Researches in Medicine, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.24504/itetsu.39.0_44 |
| Authors |
玉手 慎太郎 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 10 | 26% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 95% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,632,572
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Japanese Association for Philosophical and Ethical Researches in Medicine
#1
of 53 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,499
of 433,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Japanese Association for Philosophical and Ethical Researches in Medicine
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them