↓ Skip to main content

Structured output methods and environmental issues: perspectives on co-created bottom-up and ‘sideways’ science

Overview of attention for article published in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Structured output methods and environmental issues: perspectives on co-created bottom-up and ‘sideways’ science
Published in
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, August 2022
DOI 10.1057/s41599-022-01304-3
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Researcher 3 6%
Lecturer 2 4%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 30 61%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 7 14%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 29 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2022.
All research outputs
#21,311,865
of 32,455,005 outputs
Outputs from Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
#1,793
of 3,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,695
of 444,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
#62
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,455,005 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.