You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Spatial Positioning and Matrix Programs of Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Promote T-cell Exclusion in Human Lung Tumors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Discovery, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-1714 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John A. Grout, Philemon Sirven, Andrew M. Leader, Shrisha Maskey, Eglantine Hector, Isabelle Puisieux, Fiona Steffan, Evan Cheng, Navpreet Tung, Mathieu Maurin, Romain Vaineau, Lea Karpf, Martin Plaud, Anne-Laure Begue, Koushik Ganesh, Jérémy Mesple, Maria Casanova-Acebes, Alexandra Tabachnikova, Shilpa Keerthivasan, Alona Lansky, Jessica Le Berichel, Laura Walker, Adeeb H. Rahman, Sacha Gnjatic, Nicolas Girard, Marine Lefevre, Diane Damotte, Julien Adam, Jerome C. Martin, Andrea Wolf, Raja M. Flores, Mary Beth Beasley, Rachana Pradhan, Soren Muller, Thomas U. Marron, Shannon J. Turley, Miriam Merad, Ephraim Kenigsberg, Hélène Salmon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 115 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 34 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 8% |
| France | 6 | 5% |
| Spain | 5 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 38 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 63 | 55% |
| Scientists | 39 | 34% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 146 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 55 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 22 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 58 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2023.
All research outputs
#567,878
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#297
of 4,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,014
of 431,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#12
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.