You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Possible Return of Acropora cervicornis at Pulaski Shoal, Dry Tortugas National Park, Florida
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Coastal Research, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2112/jcoastres-d-12-00078.1 |
| Authors |
Barbara H. Lidz, David G. Zawada |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Guadeloupe | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 31% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 49% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 8 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Coastal Research
#197
of 723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,383
of 285,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Coastal Research
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.