↓ Skip to main content

JCS 2022 Guideline on Management and Re-Interventional Therapy in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease Long-Term After Initial Repair

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation Journal, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
JCS 2022 Guideline on Management and Re-Interventional Therapy in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease Long-Term After Initial Repair
Published in
Circulation Journal, August 2022
DOI 10.1253/circj.cj-22-0134
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hideo Ohuchi, Masaaki Kawata, Hideki Uemura, Teiji Akagi, Atsushi Yao, Hideaki Senzaki, Shingo Kasahara, Hajime Ichikawa, Hirohiko Motoki, Morio Syoda, Hisashi Sugiyama, Hiroyuki Tsutsui, Kei Inai, Takaaki Suzuki, Kisaburo Sakamoto, Syunsuke Tatebe, Tomoko Ishizu, Yumi Shiina, Shigeru Tateno, Aya Miyazaki, Norihisa Toh, Ichiro Sakamoto, Chisato Izumi, Yoshiko Mizuno, Atsuko Kato, Koichi Sagawa, Ryota Ochiai, Fukiko Ichida, Takeshi Kimura, Hikaru Matsuda, Koichiro Niwa, on behalf of the Japanese Circulation Society Joint Working Group

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Other 3 10%
Student > Master 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Researcher 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 17 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unknown 17 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,031,641
of 25,937,538 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#79
of 2,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,943
of 433,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,937,538 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.