You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Twitter Predicts Citation Rates of Ecological Research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0166570 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brandon K. Peoples, Stephen R. Midway, Dana Sackett, Abigail Lynch, Patrick B. Cooney |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,120 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 171 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 138 | 12% |
| Australia | 63 | 6% |
| Canada | 56 | 5% |
| Spain | 38 | 3% |
| Japan | 33 | 3% |
| Germany | 32 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 17 | 2% |
| France | 16 | 1% |
| Other | 161 | 14% |
| Unknown | 395 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 615 | 55% |
| Scientists | 405 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 64 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 35 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 256 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 48 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 9% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Other | 74 | 27% |
| Unknown | 36 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 70 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 35 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 23 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 56 | 21% |
| Unknown | 57 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 765. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2022.
All research outputs
#25,969
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#421
of 224,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#471
of 317,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#9
of 3,944 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,944 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.