You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Administrative Errors and Race: Can Technology Mitigate Inequitable Administrative Outcomes?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jopart/muac036 |
| Authors |
Mallory E Compton, Matthew M Young, Justin B Bullock, Robert Greer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 43% |
| Greece | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 53% |
| Scientists | 13 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 37 | 77% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 7 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 37 | 77% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,743,694
of 25,591,967 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory
#94
of 763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,528
of 430,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,591,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.