↓ Skip to main content

Genetic analyses of the electrocardiographic QT interval and its components identify additional loci and pathways

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
40 X users

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Genetic analyses of the electrocardiographic QT interval and its components identify additional loci and pathways
Published in
Nature Communications, September 2022
DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-32821-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

William J. Young, Najim Lahrouchi, Aaron Isaacs, ThuyVy Duong, Luisa Foco, Farah Ahmed, Jennifer A. Brody, Reem Salman, Raymond Noordam, Jan-Walter Benjamins, Jeffrey Haessler, Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen, Linda Repetto, Maria Pina Concas, Marten E. van den Berg, Stefan Weiss, Antoine R. Baldassari, Traci M. Bartz, James P. Cook, Daniel S. Evans, Rebecca Freudling, Oliver Hines, Jonas L. Isaksen, Honghuang Lin, Hao Mei, Arden Moscati, Martina Müller-Nurasyid, Casia Nursyifa, Yong Qian, Anne Richmond, Carolina Roselli, Kathleen A. Ryan, Eduardo Tarazona-Santos, Sébastien Thériault, Stefan van Duijvenboden, Helen R. Warren, Jie Yao, Dania Raza, Stefanie Aeschbacher, Gustav Ahlberg, Alvaro Alonso, Laura Andreasen, Joshua C. Bis, Eric Boerwinkle, Archie Campbell, Eulalia Catamo, Massimiliano Cocca, Michael J. Cutler, Dawood Darbar, Alessandro De Grandi, Antonio De Luca, Jun Ding, Christina Ellervik, Patrick T. Ellinor, Stephan B. Felix, Philippe Froguel, Christian Fuchsberger, Martin Gögele, Claus Graff, Mariaelisa Graff, Xiuqing Guo, Torben Hansen, Susan R. Heckbert, Paul L. Huang, Heikki V. Huikuri, Nina Hutri-Kähönen, M. Arfan Ikram, Rebecca D. Jackson, Juhani Junttila, Maryam Kavousi, Jan A. Kors, Thiago P. Leal, Rozenn N. Lemaitre, Henry J. Lin, Lars Lind, Allan Linneberg, Simin Liu, Peter W. MacFarlane, Massimo Mangino, Thomas Meitinger, Massimo Mezzavilla, Pashupati P. Mishra, Rebecca N. Mitchell, Nina Mononen, May E. Montasser, Alanna C. Morrison, Matthias Nauck, Victor Nauffal, Pau Navarro, Kjell Nikus, Guillaume Pare, Kristen K. Patton, Giulia Pelliccione, Alan Pittman, David J. Porteous, Peter P. Pramstaller, Michael H. Preuss, Olli T. Raitakari, Alexander P. Reiner, Antonio Luiz P. Ribeiro, Kenneth M. Rice, Lorenz Risch, David Schlessinger, Ulrich Schotten, Claudia Schurmann, Xia Shen, M. Benjamin Shoemaker, Gianfranco Sinagra, Moritz F. Sinner, Elsayed Z. Soliman, Monika Stoll, Konstantin Strauch, Kirill Tarasov, Kent D. Taylor, Andrew Tinker, Stella Trompet, André Uitterlinden, Uwe Völker, Henry Völzke, Melanie Waldenberger, Lu-Chen Weng, Eric A. Whitsel, James G. Wilson, Christy L. Avery, David Conen, Adolfo Correa, Francesco Cucca, Marcus Dörr, Sina A. Gharib, Giorgia Girotto, Niels Grarup, Caroline Hayward, Yalda Jamshidi, Marjo-Riitta Järvelin, J. Wouter Jukema, Stefan Kääb, Mika Kähönen, Jørgen K. Kanters, Charles Kooperberg, Terho Lehtimäki, Maria Fernanda Lima-Costa, Yongmei Liu, Ruth J. F. Loos, Steven A. Lubitz, Dennis O. Mook-Kanamori, Andrew P. Morris, Jeffrey R. O’Connell, Morten Salling Olesen, Michele Orini, Sandosh Padmanabhan, Cristian Pattaro, Annette Peters, Bruce M. Psaty, Jerome I. Rotter, Bruno Stricker, Pim van der Harst, Cornelia M. van Duijn, Niek Verweij, James F. Wilson, Dan E. Arking, Julia Ramirez, Pier D. Lambiase, Nona Sotoodehnia, Borbala Mifsud, Christopher Newton-Cheh, Patricia B. Munroe

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 51 50%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 12%
Engineering 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 54 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,931,246
of 32,394,374 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#28,471
of 77,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,059
of 444,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#731
of 1,887 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,394,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,887 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.