↓ Skip to main content

Conservation of Side-Chain Dynamics Within a Protein Family

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Chemical Society, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Conservation of Side-Chain Dynamics Within a Protein Family
Published in
Journal of the American Chemical Society, April 2009
DOI 10.1021/ja809915a
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The question of protein dynamics and its relevance to function is currently a topic of great interest. Proteins are particularly dynamic at the side-chain level on the time scale of picoseconds to nanoseconds. Here, we present a comparison of NMR-monitored side-chain motion between three PDZ domains of approximately 30% sequence identity and show that the side-chain dynamics display nontrivial conservation. Methyl (2)H relaxation was carried out to determine side-chain order parameters (S(2)), which were found to be more similar than naively expected from sequence, local packing, or a combination of the two. Thus, the dynamics of a rather distant homologue appears to be an excellent predictor of a protein's side-chain dynamics and, on average, better than current structure-based methods. Fast side-chain dynamics therefore display a high level of organization associated with global fold. Beyond simple conservation, the analysis herein suggests that the pattern of side-chain flexibility has significant contributions from nonlocal elements of the PDZ fold, such as correlated motions, and that the conserved dynamics may directly support function.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 6%
Turkey 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 62 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 13%
Professor 8 11%
Other 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 30%
Chemistry 20 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 14%
Physics and Astronomy 6 9%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 8 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2010.
All research outputs
#7,605,073
of 28,841,988 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#30,201
of 73,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,342
of 119,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#162
of 360 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,841,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 73,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 360 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.