You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Limitations of Captive Breeding in Endangered Species Recovery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Biology, February 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020338.x |
| Authors |
Noel F.R. Snyder, Scott R. Derrickson, Steven R. Beissinger, James W. Wiley, Thomas B. Smith, William D. Toone, Brian Miller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 980 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 1% |
| Brazil | 9 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| South Africa | 3 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 2 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 1% |
| Unknown | 912 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 215 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 194 | 20% |
| Researcher | 159 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 135 | 14% |
| Other | 40 | 4% |
| Other | 130 | 13% |
| Unknown | 107 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 533 | 54% |
| Environmental Science | 171 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 28 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 2% |
| Other | 65 | 7% |
| Unknown | 131 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2023.
All research outputs
#678,004
of 25,028,065 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#366
of 4,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#449
of 48,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#5
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,028,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.