You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bronchodilators in Tobacco-Exposed Persons with Symptoms and Preserved Lung Function
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa2204752 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
MeiLan K Han, Wen Ye, Di Wang, Emily White, Mehrdad Arjomandi, Igor Z Barjaktarevic, Stacey-Ann Brown, Russell G Buhr, Alejandro P Comellas, Christopher B Cooper, Gerard J Criner, Mark T Dransfield, Frank Drescher, Rodney J Folz, Nadia N Hansel, Ravi Kalhan, Robert J Kaner, Richard E Kanner, Jerry A Krishnan, Stephen C Lazarus, Veeranna Maddipati, Fernando J Martinez, Anne Mathews, Catherine Meldrum, Charlene McEvoy, Toru Nyunoya, Linda Rogers, William W Stringer, Christine H Wendt, Robert A Wise, Stephen R Wisniewski, Frank C Sciurba, Prescott G Woodruff |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 131 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 31 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 11% |
| Canada | 8 | 6% |
| Spain | 6 | 5% |
| Korea, Republic of | 3 | 2% |
| Japan | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 46 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 78 | 60% |
| Scientists | 28 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 30 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 51% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 32 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 562. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2023.
All research outputs
#43,729
of 25,934,828 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#1,527
of 32,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,399
of 434,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#49
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,934,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 123.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.